The title statement simply means that sometimes people are too close to a situation (the trees) to see the bigger picture (the forest). But when you stand a ways back, and aren't so emotionally invested in the guilty verdict, the evidence starts to make sense, and it says quite plainly, Scott is Innocent.
Here's an article from Daily Mail in the UK that is well worth the read. It highlights the Diane Jackson sighting of the van and 3 men in front of the Medina home on the morning of 12-24-02, and Ted Rowlands adamant assertion that the Medina burglary did not happen on the morning of the 26th, as claimed by Todd and Pearce and believed by the MPD, because he did the early show for his TV station and he was there, right in front of the Peterson house that morning starting at 5 am, keeping a very intense lookout for anyone he might be able to interview live for his show.
The Daily Mail is a British tabloid, like the Enquirer is a US tabloid. But unlike so many of the Enquirer articles during the investigation and trial that only cited "sources close to the investigation," or "sources close to the family, " or something similar, never giving a name or face to the source, this articles does give names and faces to its sources.
Thursday, September 21, 2017
Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Coming to grips with the truth
I understand that many people are very convinced that Scott Peterson is stone-cold guilty. Or as radaronline put it, "the nation's most cold-hearted killer since OJ." In an article published just today, Radaronline reported excerpts from the Enquirer-produced documentary on Investigation Discovery channel.
I also understand that investigators and DA's have confidence in their cases -- I don't think it would be too healthy if they were always second-guessing themselves. However, I think a great deal of objectivity and humility is essential in a job that has the authority to affect people's lives in a very profound way for a very long time.
Mark Smith is a private investigator out of Tracy, CA. His website. Mark Smith Investigations, gives this summary of his investigative experience on the About Us page, emphasis added.
He frequently comments on the "lies" in the series, often attributing those lies to the Peterson family or the SPA group. He expects people to take his word for everything he says because he "was there." And he actually was there. However, he does not have a good command of the facts and corrects the alleged lies in the series with his own lies -- or should I more politely say, his own misinformation.
One particular "lie" that he accused the SPA team of in last night's episode involved public knowledge of Scott's fishing route from the Berkeley Marina to Brooks Island. He argues that the MPD did put out information early on that Scott went to the Marina, but it was a long time before the media was aware of Scott's claim to have been by Brooks Island. Here is a major portion of his comment.
As a member of the SPA Team, I have collected a lot of information over the years, especially media coverage. I don't know exactly what Smith means by "a long time," as time is relevant, but there was media coverage of the MPD search of the Brooks Island on January 4, 2003. That was only 2 days after the MPD released photos of Scott's truck and boat and asked if anyone recalled seeing the truck or boat to call the MPD.
How do I know there was media coverage of the search of Brooks Island on January 4? Because the Modesto Bee newspaper carried the story the next day, complete with pictures and an interview with Sgt. Ron Cloward, who was overseeing the search. It's most likely that, given the intense coverage of this case, the TV networks showed footage of the search and identified where the search was taking place as it was happening on the 4th, and the newspapers followed up with details in the next morning's edition on the 5th. The Modesto Bee certainly did.
The Modesto Bee article not only specifically stated that Scott launched his boat at the Marina but that he also "went northwest and fished around Brooks Island." The Modesto Bee newspaper even included a map insert showing Brooks Island.
Now you can determine for yourself whether 2 days is "a long time."
I also understand that investigators and DA's have confidence in their cases -- I don't think it would be too healthy if they were always second-guessing themselves. However, I think a great deal of objectivity and humility is essential in a job that has the authority to affect people's lives in a very profound way for a very long time.
Mark Smith is a private investigator out of Tracy, CA. His website. Mark Smith Investigations, gives this summary of his investigative experience on the About Us page, emphasis added.
Hello, my name is Mark Smith and I'm the owner of Mark Smith Investigations. I recently retired from a 28 year law enforcement career. I spent the first 10 years of my career as a municipal police officer and detective in the San Francisco Bay Area. I spent the last almost 18 years as a Criminal Investigator and Lieutenant of Investigators for the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office. While working with the District Attorney I worked assignments in Homicide, Major Narcotics, Public Corruption, and Mortgage Fraud. I was most recently assigned to the FBI's San Joaquin Valley Mortgage Fraud Task Force and was cross-designated as a Special Deputy United States Marshal. I worked real estate and mortgage fraud cases enforcing both State and Federal law and helped to prosecute cases in both State and Federal Courts.Mark Smith has been commenting on the A&E Murder of Laci Peterson Facebook page. To do so is his right. He is no longer with the DA's office and the gag order was lifted by Judge Delucchi in March 2005 after the sentencing.
While with the District Attorney I spent seven years as a Lieutenant supervising a staff of Criminal Investigators and civilian employees. I supervised the District Attorney Investigations staff that was assigned to the Scott Peterson murder trial and I coordinated much of the logistics for the trial. Also while with the District Attorney I conducted numerous internal employee investigations for misconduct as well as numerous pre-employment background investigations. I also worked many criminal investigations involving government employees, including cases involving police officers and elected officials.
He frequently comments on the "lies" in the series, often attributing those lies to the Peterson family or the SPA group. He expects people to take his word for everything he says because he "was there." And he actually was there. However, he does not have a good command of the facts and corrects the alleged lies in the series with his own lies -- or should I more politely say, his own misinformation.
One particular "lie" that he accused the SPA team of in last night's episode involved public knowledge of Scott's fishing route from the Berkeley Marina to Brooks Island. He argues that the MPD did put out information early on that Scott went to the Marina, but it was a long time before the media was aware of Scott's claim to have been by Brooks Island. Here is a major portion of his comment.
How do I know there was media coverage of the search of Brooks Island on January 4? Because the Modesto Bee newspaper carried the story the next day, complete with pictures and an interview with Sgt. Ron Cloward, who was overseeing the search. It's most likely that, given the intense coverage of this case, the TV networks showed footage of the search and identified where the search was taking place as it was happening on the 4th, and the newspapers followed up with details in the next morning's edition on the 5th. The Modesto Bee certainly did.
The Modesto Bee article not only specifically stated that Scott launched his boat at the Marina but that he also "went northwest and fished around Brooks Island." The Modesto Bee newspaper even included a map insert showing Brooks Island.
Now you can determine for yourself whether 2 days is "a long time."
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
The Mailman's Timeline
This information updates and corrects information previously included in the article "The Mailman's Timeline" published on March 1, 2008.
On December 24, 2002 he arrived at his first scan at 10:19 a.m. and at his last scan at 3:41 p.m. for a total of 5 hours and 22 minutes delivery time.
Graybill’s Route Scan Schedule
This is the schedule that Graybill printed out showing his scan times for December 24, 2002. It includes a notation about the time he delivered mail to the Peterson house. This was entered as Prosecution Exhibit 34.
Graybill’s Testimony
Prosecution Exhibit 33, which was used during Graybill’s testimony, does not show the houses on Rowlands, south of Encina, where he delivered mail in the first part of his route.
Interpretation of the route based on testimony:
Graybill was the Petersons’ postman, and he delivered mail to the Peterson home between 10:35 and 10:50 a.m. on December 24, 2002. (Exhibit 2 [Declaration of Russell Graybill] at HCP-000005-06; Exhibit 19 [Russell Graybill’s Delivery Record].) Graybill knew the Petersons’ dog, McKenzi, and explained to police (and has recently declared) that McKenzi would bark at him no matter where on the property the dog happened to be. (Exhibit 3 [Statement of Russell Graybill] at HCP-000008.) Whether the dog was in the front or back yards, or even inside the house, McKenzi would bark at Graybill. (Exh. 2 at HCP-000005.)
GRAYBILL’S ROUTE
Russell
Graybill was scheduled to deliver mail to 500 homes (testimony) during the
course of his day. He had the kind of route that is called a park and loop. He
would park at a certain spot and then get out of his truck and deliver mail on
foot to all the houses that area. There
were scan points on a few mailboxes along his route to determine where he was
at certain times.
On December 24, 2002 he arrived at his first scan at 10:19 a.m. and at his last scan at 3:41 p.m. for a total of 5 hours and 22 minutes delivery time.
Graybill’s Route Scan Schedule
This is the schedule that Graybill printed out showing his scan times for December 24, 2002. It includes a notation about the time he delivered mail to the Peterson house. This was entered as Prosecution Exhibit 34.
Graybill’s Testimony
Prosecution Exhibit 33, which was used during Graybill’s testimony, does not show the houses on Rowlands, south of Encina, where he delivered mail in the first part of his route.
Excerpts from Graybill’s testimony:
My
first stop would be 1402 Encina. I would walk down 1424, go across the street,
deliver all these houses here, come back across Encina, go down Rowland, to the
400 block, which is off the map, come back up, come back to my vehicle.
That's the first relay. Then I would get in my vehicle and I would drive to
1520 Encina, and I would shut the vehicle off, get out, drop the mail at that
house. Drive around here, shut the vehicle off, drop the mail, drive around,
shut the vehicle off. Same thing at 1515. Then I would park the vehicle……………
HARRIS: And
specifically looking at Covena, do you see the boxes starting to the right side
of Covena above where it says Pierre Park 508, 516, 525 (sic), 526?
GRAYBILL: Yes,
sir.
HARRIS: And
do those represent the houses on the -- that would be the east side of the
Covena Street?
GRAYBILL: The
street addresses, yes, sir.
HARRIS: And
then starting from the bottom and working on the west side of the street, 511,
517, 523. 523 Covena?
GRAYBILL: Yes,
sir.
Interpretation of the route based on testimony:
· Graybill’s first scan was at 1424 Encina). He parked at
1402 Encina Avenue and delivered mail to that house and to the scan point (*yellow) at 1424 (2
houses). Then he crossed Encina to the
north side of the street and delivered mail to some of the houses on that block
(5 houses). After that, he crossed back over Encina and delivered mail up and
down Rowlands in the 400 block (16 houses).
· Then he got back in his truck and drove to 1520 Encina where he
parked and delivered to that house (1 house.)
· He turned north on the access road that runs along the vineyard and
drove up to the short block of Encina where he parked and delivered to 1519
Encina (1 house); and then parked and delivered at 1515 Encina (1 house).
· Graybill then parked at the corner of ”little Encina“ and
Covena and got out of his truck to deliver to 8 houses on the 500 block of
Covena. He started up the east side of
the street for the houses at 508, 516, 520, 526, then crossed over to the west
side for the houses at 529, 523, 517, and 511.
·
(The only people home at the time were Fleischman-508,
Krigbaum/Venable-520 , and possibly Servas-517.) Detail:
o
508 - Fleischman – home
o
516 - Medina – away, left home at 10:32 for a trip to
Los Angeles
o
520 - Krigbaum/Venable – sleeping until 10:38, did not get up
right away
o
526 - Wilmes - away
o
529 - Reed – vacant (B2443)
o
523 - Peterson – gate
open, McKenzie not there
o
517 - Servas – found dog
no later than 10:18 and then left for errands
o
511 - Ikerd – away
·
Then he got back into his truck and drove south on Covena across
Encina to deliver to the 400 block of Covena.
Missing Information From Graybill Included in the Habeas document
From the habeas document:
On December 27, 2002, Graybill was interviewed Officer M. Callahan and Detective Skultety of the Modesto Police Department. According to Callahan’s handwritten police report, Graybill stated the following in response to the officer’s question “what he remembered from December 24, 2002 when he delivered mail in this area”:
……………“[Graybill] said he entered the area around 1030 to 1045 in the morning. He said he couldn’t remember anything unusual from 516 Covena, but remembered the gate was open at 523 Covena. He said usually the dog barks at him from behind the gate. On 12-24-02 the gate was open and he did not see or hear the dog at 523 Covena.” (See Exh. 3 at HCP-00008.)
More text from the habeas document:
Conclusion
Russell Graybill told MPD officers on 12-27-02 that the gate was open and McKenzie was not on the property at the time he delivered mail to the Peterson house between 10:35 and 10:50 on December 24. In spite of this information, MPD claimed that Laci had gone missing before Karen Servas found McKenzi in the street at 10:18, put him back in the yard, and closed the gate. The Graybill information shows that Laci was not missing when Servas found McKenzi. She was very much alive, and took McKenzi for a walk sometime after Servas found him and before Graybill arrived to deliver the mail.
Sunday, September 17, 2017
Dr. Cheng - Tidal Evidence
Anyone familiar with the Scott Peterson trial knows that tidal evidence, as presented by Dr. Ralph Cheng, played a significant role in Scott's conviction. It's not that he was needed to prove that Laci was in the Bay, but to prove no one else put her in the Bay, only Scott could have put Laci in the Bay.
The Prosecutors knew there was a likelihood that Scott's defense lawyer, Mark Geragos, would argue that someone else killed Laci and put her where it was widely publicized that he had been on the 24th -- fishing along a route from the Berkeley Marina to Brooks Island. So the killer(s) simply put her body there.
The Prosecution also likely knew that the killer(s) wouldn't need a boat to put her in the area that would naturally incriminate Scott. Indeed, there are numerous places along the shoreline from the Berkeley Marina to Richmond that a car could have pulled up alongside the shoreline and simply dumped a body in. And there are places along that shoreline with very large riprap and other debris on which a body could get caught and be concealed from public view. Especially at the Albany Bulb.
Where ever she washed ashore, whenever she washed ashore, the police, the media, and the public would conclude that Scott was guilty.
How do I know they likely knew these things? Because I assume they had the intelligence to anticipate arguments from the defense and be sure they could counter them. So they would investigate the area themselves to see if there was another way Geragos could argue the bodies could have gotten into the Bay.
Dr. Cheng's role was to show that the bodies came from Scott's fishing route, not somewhere along the shoreline. He first had to explain why it took so long for the bodies to wash ashore. He said it was a combination of strong winds on April 12, 2003 concurrent with a negative low tide that caused the bodies to dislodge and begin moving towards shore.
In his words, "wow, quite a wind event during that day. I really recall in my own mind, you can see now the scientific records showed us now during that particular period of time, in the morning, or starting from the midnight of the midnight April 11th, or early morning of April 12th, you can see wind exceeded 40 knots. 40 knots, wind exceeded. Also a sustained wind for long period of time, subsided slightly, but still continued on for another good twelve, eighteen hours with wind average around twenty knots per hour. So that is quite a magnitude of wind. And during that period of time, there was occurrence of a very low tide right after noon of April 12th."
Let's look at the 3 elements of his argument for this "wind event" on April 11-12:
The Prosecutors knew there was a likelihood that Scott's defense lawyer, Mark Geragos, would argue that someone else killed Laci and put her where it was widely publicized that he had been on the 24th -- fishing along a route from the Berkeley Marina to Brooks Island. So the killer(s) simply put her body there.
The Prosecution also likely knew that the killer(s) wouldn't need a boat to put her in the area that would naturally incriminate Scott. Indeed, there are numerous places along the shoreline from the Berkeley Marina to Richmond that a car could have pulled up alongside the shoreline and simply dumped a body in. And there are places along that shoreline with very large riprap and other debris on which a body could get caught and be concealed from public view. Especially at the Albany Bulb.
Where ever she washed ashore, whenever she washed ashore, the police, the media, and the public would conclude that Scott was guilty.
How do I know they likely knew these things? Because I assume they had the intelligence to anticipate arguments from the defense and be sure they could counter them. So they would investigate the area themselves to see if there was another way Geragos could argue the bodies could have gotten into the Bay.
Dr. Cheng's role was to show that the bodies came from Scott's fishing route, not somewhere along the shoreline. He first had to explain why it took so long for the bodies to wash ashore. He said it was a combination of strong winds on April 12, 2003 concurrent with a negative low tide that caused the bodies to dislodge and begin moving towards shore.
In his words, "wow, quite a wind event during that day. I really recall in my own mind, you can see now the scientific records showed us now during that particular period of time, in the morning, or starting from the midnight of the midnight April 11th, or early morning of April 12th, you can see wind exceeded 40 knots. 40 knots, wind exceeded. Also a sustained wind for long period of time, subsided slightly, but still continued on for another good twelve, eighteen hours with wind average around twenty knots per hour. So that is quite a magnitude of wind. And during that period of time, there was occurrence of a very low tide right after noon of April 12th."
Let's look at the 3 elements of his argument for this "wind event" on April 11-12:
- Wind exceeded 40 knots
- Sustained winds of average 20 knots for 12-18 hours
- Concurrent with the very low tide right after noon of April 12
I fact-checked Dr. Cheng's claims by surveying 11 area weather stations that measured wind and had their data online. I also copied a graph of the tide on April 12 from the NOAA Richmond station to compare with the wind data. I started with the wind stations closest to where the bodies washed ashore and spread out from there. I surveyed:
- the NOAA Richmond Station,
- the UC Richmond Station,
- the East Bay Municipal Utility District station on Point Isabel,
- the Oakland North RAWS (Remote Automated Weather Station),
- the wind station at the Berkeley Marina,
- the wind station on Angel Island,
- the wind station on Treasure Island,
- the Oakland South RAWS (Remote Automated Weather Station),
- the NOAA Alameda station,
- the wind station on Crown Beach in Alameda,
- the Oakland Airport weather station
Thursday, July 20, 2017
A&E presenting its 6-week, 7-hour docuseries The murder of Laci Peterson
http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwtv/article/VIDEO-First-Look-AE-Documentary-Series-THE-MURDER-OF-LACI-PETERSON-20170717
A&E Network will premiere the new six-episode, limited documentary series, THE MURDER OF LACI PETERSON showcasing new interviews with Scott Peterson himself from prison. The series explores the infamous Scott Peterson trial, the case that destroyed a family, gripped a nation and defined an era, as a vehicle for understanding America's criminal justice system and the ways in which outside influences can affect that system. "The Murder of Laci Peterson" is set to premiere Tuesday, August 15 at 10PM ET/PT on A&E.
"A&E is in the business of finding and uncovering the real stories behind some of the most impactful cultural moments that our audience hasn't heard and 'The Murder of Laci Peterson' does exactly that," said Elaine Frontain Bryant, Executive Vice President and Head of Programming, A&E Network."The media's obsession with the Scott Peterson trial was unlike anything seen before. This new series will cut through the mass hysteria that has plagued and distorted the reporting of this story to deliver, for the first time, a definitive factual account by those who lived and breathed it every day."
The mystery of Laci Peterson's disappearance on Christmas Eve 2002 captivated the nation. Eight months pregnant, she vanished without a trace. Her body and that of her unborn child, Conner, appeared four months later on the shores of the San Francisco Bay causing a media frenzy on both a local and national level. To this day, no one knows exactly when, where or how she died, only that her husband Scott Peterson was convicted of murder and sentenced to death, despite the absence of DNA evidence or eyewitness testimony. Scott Peterson's conviction was less a tribute to the efficacy of the legal system than it was a case study for the overwhelming power of modern media to deliver the facts of news in a way that creates irresistible tabloid fodder.
As the 15th Anniversary of Laci Peterson's disappearance approaches, "The Murder of Laci Peterson" takes a fresh, new look at the case, reexamining the circumstantial evidence and assessing the media's influence on the case and its outcome. This documentary series will include unprecedented access to Scott Peterson and his family as they speak directly and candidly about Scott's conviction. In addition, the series will include interviews with an expansive and impressive list of key eyewitnesses, experts, lawyers, cops, journalists, detectives (professional and amateur), including Nancy Grace, Gloria Allred, Amber Frey, Detectives Jon Buehler and Ed Steele, journalists Ken Auletta and Maureen Orth, reporters Gloria Gomez and Garth Stapley, Scott Peterson's trial co-counsel Pat Harris, his appellate attorney Cliff Gardner, attorney and CNN and ABC contributor Chris Pixley and local reporter turned CNN correspondent Ted Rowlands among many others.
"The Murder of Laci Peterson" is produced for A&E Network by Left/Right and BQE Films.Executive producers for Left/Right are Banks Tarver, Ken Druckerman, and John Marks.Executive producers for BQE Films are Shareen Anderson and Po Kutchins. Executive producers for A&E are Elaine Frontain Bryant, Amy Savitsky, Brad Abramson and Emily Flood. A+E Networks holds worldwide distribution rights for "The Murder of Laci Peterson."
A&E Network will premiere the new six-episode, limited documentary series, THE MURDER OF LACI PETERSON showcasing new interviews with Scott Peterson himself from prison. The series explores the infamous Scott Peterson trial, the case that destroyed a family, gripped a nation and defined an era, as a vehicle for understanding America's criminal justice system and the ways in which outside influences can affect that system. "The Murder of Laci Peterson" is set to premiere Tuesday, August 15 at 10PM ET/PT on A&E.
"A&E is in the business of finding and uncovering the real stories behind some of the most impactful cultural moments that our audience hasn't heard and 'The Murder of Laci Peterson' does exactly that," said Elaine Frontain Bryant, Executive Vice President and Head of Programming, A&E Network."The media's obsession with the Scott Peterson trial was unlike anything seen before. This new series will cut through the mass hysteria that has plagued and distorted the reporting of this story to deliver, for the first time, a definitive factual account by those who lived and breathed it every day."
The mystery of Laci Peterson's disappearance on Christmas Eve 2002 captivated the nation. Eight months pregnant, she vanished without a trace. Her body and that of her unborn child, Conner, appeared four months later on the shores of the San Francisco Bay causing a media frenzy on both a local and national level. To this day, no one knows exactly when, where or how she died, only that her husband Scott Peterson was convicted of murder and sentenced to death, despite the absence of DNA evidence or eyewitness testimony. Scott Peterson's conviction was less a tribute to the efficacy of the legal system than it was a case study for the overwhelming power of modern media to deliver the facts of news in a way that creates irresistible tabloid fodder.
As the 15th Anniversary of Laci Peterson's disappearance approaches, "The Murder of Laci Peterson" takes a fresh, new look at the case, reexamining the circumstantial evidence and assessing the media's influence on the case and its outcome. This documentary series will include unprecedented access to Scott Peterson and his family as they speak directly and candidly about Scott's conviction. In addition, the series will include interviews with an expansive and impressive list of key eyewitnesses, experts, lawyers, cops, journalists, detectives (professional and amateur), including Nancy Grace, Gloria Allred, Amber Frey, Detectives Jon Buehler and Ed Steele, journalists Ken Auletta and Maureen Orth, reporters Gloria Gomez and Garth Stapley, Scott Peterson's trial co-counsel Pat Harris, his appellate attorney Cliff Gardner, attorney and CNN and ABC contributor Chris Pixley and local reporter turned CNN correspondent Ted Rowlands among many others.
"The Murder of Laci Peterson" is produced for A&E Network by Left/Right and BQE Films.Executive producers for Left/Right are Banks Tarver, Ken Druckerman, and John Marks.Executive producers for BQE Films are Shareen Anderson and Po Kutchins. Executive producers for A&E are Elaine Frontain Bryant, Amy Savitsky, Brad Abramson and Emily Flood. A+E Networks holds worldwide distribution rights for "The Murder of Laci Peterson."
Friday, April 21, 2017
The "newly unearthed interrogation video"
Dateline is using the guise of a "newly unearthed interrogation video" to draw attention to its 2-hour show on Scott's case tonite. It's the interrogation that Brocchini did at midnight the day Laci disappeared, so there's nothing new about it -- in fact, it was shown in court and the transcript has been on pwc-SII for years. http://pwc-sii.com/CourtDocs/Exhibits/P-68.htm
A short clip is posed on Scott Peterson Appeal facebook page. https://www.facebook.com/ScottPetersonAppeal/
A short clip is posed on Scott Peterson Appeal facebook page. https://www.facebook.com/ScottPetersonAppeal/
Thursday, April 13, 2017
Watch for these two specials on Scott's case.
April 21st, Dateline, at 9 pm
May 7, Oxygen Channel, Snapped. This appears to be the season's opener.
Here's a clip from Snapped.
April 21st, Dateline, at 9 pm
May 7, Oxygen Channel, Snapped. This appears to be the season's opener.
Here's a clip from Snapped.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)