tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4083330089081355373.post1656439609342391054..comments2023-08-24T10:28:18.911-05:00Comments on Justice for Scott Peterson: FRY v. PLILER -- The different standards for harmless errorMarlene Newellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08776470021880189163noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4083330089081355373.post-64617886472084633532007-06-13T14:24:00.000-05:002007-06-13T14:24:00.000-05:00From the PWC Newsletter:"The Innocence Network, a ...From the PWC Newsletter:<BR/><BR/>"The Innocence Network, a pro bono legal network that provides appellate representation and investigation services to prisoners whose innocence might be proven based on compelling evidence post-conviction, filed an amicus brief on January 22, 2007 on Fry’s behalf, arguing that the Brecht standard should only be used in federal courts if the state has conducted a Chapman review of the trial error."<BR/> <BR/>Fry's position was supported by the Innocence Network. I'm sure they regret this week's Supreme Court decision.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com